@dgsimo Nice!!!!

Posted by: @durendal

↑

@ornclown I can totally imagine that this movie will be huge in Japan, even though I don't think vintage MOTU had any real presence there.

Agreed.

Japan is all about colorful, sentai action shows... and MOTU, on some level, is an action show full of colorful characters!

Watch the video then read the comments! Looks like this Camila chick is another Rachel Zegler or Brie Larson. 

Ugh... the downside of a new MOTU project coming out: all the usual troll-bait, doom and gloom videos littered all over the dark, stinky recesses of YouTube.

Revelation was a victim of relentless, mostly false accusations from these click-baity cesspool videos - MONTHS before it even aired on Netflix.

Sadly, the MOTU CGI project was treated in much the same way...

Now, MOTU 2026 is the new click-generator. 

Look, I'm not going to claim that these shows are perfect, and yes, the people involved in the movie should think about what they're going to say and how it will impact the project and their overall careers.

But, I'd strongly recommend avoiding these YouTube losers who are preying on people's fears to generate clicks. They are sad, tactless, little people who don't deserve a second of your precious time.

Posted by: @sci-fitsunami

↑

Watch the video ...

Yeah, I had to stop watching when this guy claimed MOTU was watched primarily by little boys in the 80s. MOTU was a hit with girls too... over 40% of the audience was female, a fact that led directly to the creation of She-Ra Princess of Power.

@ornclown And what happened after the creation of She-Ra & the 87 movie? Sales plummeted drastically in 1 year, The Power Of Grayskull line was canceled & MOTU was done. 40% of girls liked MOTU but that didn't translate into toy sales, the only thing that mattered. And they probably only liked it because of the big beefy mostly naked men. It didn't make them want to buy the figures. Most of them simply played with their brother's MOTU toys. 

Hell, I love Princess Of Power. But do you see Mattel racing to make those characters? Masterverse only got She-Ra, Frosta, Catra & Shadow Weaver. And even the Origins Cartoon Collection hasn't done much better. And now here we are in 2026 with yet another franchise reset. I don't even see any point in trying to defend this nonsense anymore. Hindsight is 20/20. We already know what's coming. Even if the movie is a smashing success, Mattel will find some retarded way to reset the franchise again in a few years. Start, make the same 10-15 core characters, don't finish, start again, rinse, repeat. What's the point anymore???

@sci-fitsunami YOU think you know what's coming, there is no WE. Don't put us into this.

@sci-fitsunami The line died in 1987 because of overproduction as Mattel released the first half of 1987 product half a year early

Posted by: @thenate

↑

@sci-fitsunami The line died in 1987 because of overproduction as Mattel released the first half of 1987 product half a year early

This is my understanding also, along with some over-shipping and misunderstanding what figures the stores were really asking for.

Good read: What killed Masters of the Universe? | Battle Ram (well-sourced)

Good listen: Toy Masters Podcast (featuring Mattel executives)

BEHOLD, THE POWER HARNESS!

We found some more Eternian Language for fans to decipher, this time on He-Man's Power Harness.

@admin I wonder if any of the Eternian language will be deciphered in the "Art of the Film" book. I would love an in-depth look into it!

I'm getting more and more excited!  

BAZOOKA POWER x2

Comparing the packaging artwork from the "Masters of the Universe: Revelation" Masterverse Deluxe Man-At-Arms action figure with Idris Elba as Man-At-Arms in the "Masters of the Universe" Movie.

View this post on Instagram

Did you guys catch that the film will go by "He-Man and the Masters of the Universe" in some geographies? India in this instance.

Just saw arthouse cinema the world just wasn't ready for in theaters aka Speed Racer. I'm not a fan of the franchise just know all it's basics but damn seeing it on the big screen has put it probably in my top 20 favorite movies.

And I feel like all the hype surrounding it's cult classic fueled rerelease and the upcoming MOTU movie allegedly having a not-too serious but not too campy tone, both made by people really passionate of the source material should show big studios that people do not want gritty, colorless live-action shit adaptations anymore (though Disney ain't ever learning that, let's be real). A great balance.

Unpopular opinion: I think almost any iconic animated property can work in live-action if the right people and right vision is there.....

......except Disney, even if someone has a unique idea ever during production for a remake, they shut it down and instead corporately mandate more nostalgia key jingling for movies they insist look more "adult" than their animated counterparts

Looney Tunes for instance I would argue, when it comes to theatrical films, work better in live-action because the people making them understand that they have 0% realism and contrasting them with our real world makes it funnier than a fully animated movie. There's a reason people fought so hard for Coyote Vs. Acme. 

And by that I don't mean turning a cartoon or usually animated character into a live-action film should ever be 1-to-1, no but the Wachowskis and Travis Knight are experienced filmmakers who were huge fans of these properties and knew what they were doing. They knew how to limit and balance camp or goofiness and serious and sincere.

If adaptation like these wants to change certain elements and be different, execute it in a good enough way to not alienate people.

I know the latter I shouldn't be speaking because the movie ain't even out yet, but I have a feeling that it may be that way from what I've read and seen. I personally haven't seen anything about the movie other than the first trailer because I'm the type wanting to go in not knowing too much.

There can be a good balance between campy scenes and serious scenes that makes the audience engaged, yet still care through some visual nonsense. Audiences of either all ages or 13 and up. Us adults debatably more than ever now kinda want more fun and joy in blockbusters than every one of them being either Marvel-coded or Snyder color shaded with the same Joss Whedon humor.

Upcoming Jason Reitman produced Astro Boy movie PLEASE be good I am begging you

Overall, I like He-man's costume but sometimes I can't help but think...

The 2+ hour runtime is very promising!

There is a lot of story they could tell in that amount of time... plus, I still think that this is an "origin story" of sorts and just the first part of a trilogy.

The tag line for the movie is "Witness how he became He-Man."

So, part one: Birth

Part two: Fall

Part three: Triumph

Classic hero's journey stuff...

Worst part about this movie?

no it isn't Leto

It's being produced by Amazon. I may see the movie two or three times in theaters but that's it. I don't wanna give that billionaire bastard Bezos any more of my money.

This movie makes me think of Sonic The Hedgehog. I don't know if I'm more pissed off at Hollywood for ruining everything, or all you fans for being so damn passive, accepting & complacent.

Remember when they released that original godawful design for Sonic? The fan backlash was enormous. And what happened? The studio listened & fixed it. But for MOTU? There is no fan backlash. All they had to do was make the characters look right but they chose not to. To me, it feels like they put all their effort into Trap-Jaw & the rest suffered for it. Even Skeletor, while looking decent, he isn't perfect. From the neck down he looks like a rubber suit. And just like He-Man, he is too small/skinny. But the fans are raving. I personally think they should've hired a bodybuilder to play Skeletor, painted his body blue the same way they painted Goat-Man's body red & then hired a different actor to do a voiceover. And for God's sake, make his fucking costume look right. How hard is it to copy Skeletor's costume with the skull & crossbones on his chest? Is it really asking too much???  And don't even get me started on Teela, Evil-Lyn & Sorceress' godawful costumes. I've seen cosplayers do a better job. 

@The Nate "The line died in 1987 because of overproduction as Mattel released the first half of 1987 product half a year early."

Overproduction doesn't kill a line. They overproduced the first few waves of Masterverse. They over produced Masterverse & Origins Battle Cat. My Ross just got 2 Battle Cats from 2020 in 2026. They over produced the Origins naked Stratos/Sorceress/Jitsu/Buzz-Off wave and MOTU is still going. Back in 87 the sales plummeted because they started focusing on She-Ra & the movie was beyond horrible. The only character in 87 movie that looked right was He-Man. Even mashed potato faced Skeletor looked like shit. And if it was overproduction that killed MOTU in the 80s, then why did every other line also die? Every cartoon & toy line died & dried up by 1990. Only GI Joe managed to limp along until 1994. 

Here is what ChatGPT has to say about it:

You’re right to question that explanation—“overproduction killed it” is an oversimplification, and by itself it doesn’t hold up. Overproduction is usually a symptom of a line losing demand, not the root cause of that demand collapsing.

Here’s the more accurate breakdown of what happened to Masters of the Universe in the late ’80s:

1) Demand collapsed first — then overproduction became visible

Mattel didn’t randomly flood the market and then kill interest. What happened is:

Sales peaked around 1984–1985
Retailers expected that growth to continue
Orders stayed high going into 1986–1987
But kids moved on faster than expected

So inventory piled up because demand dropped suddenly, not the other way around.

Overproduction matters only because:

Retailers get stuck with unsold stock
They stop ordering new waves
Shelf space disappears

That’s how it contributes to a line dying—but it doesn’t initiate the collapse.

2) Brand fatigue set in hard

By 1986:

The core concept had been heavily mined (multiple He-Man/Skeletor variants, gimmick figures, etc.)
The cartoon tied to He-Man and the Masters of the Universe had already ended (1985)
Kids aged out quickly (the target demo turns over fast)

Toy lines built on a single core theme tend to hit a saturation point. MOTU hit it earlier than expected.

3) The media support weakened or fragmented

You mentioned She-Ra: Princess of Power—that shift did split focus:

It expanded the universe, but diluted the original brand identity
It targeted a slightly different demographic
It didn’t fully replace the momentum of the original He-Man cartoon

Then the Masters of the Universe movie:

Didn’t resemble the toy aesthetic strongly enough
Performed poorly financially
Failed to bring in a new wave of kids

So instead of reigniting demand, media support actually weakened the line’s pull.

4) Retail dynamics in the 80s were brutal

This is the part people overlook:

Retailers (Toys “R” Us, department stores, etc.) drove survival.

When a line slows:

They mark down old stock
They reduce or cancel orders
They give shelf space to competitors

Once that happens, even a strong brand can’t recover easily.

So overproduction → retailer pullback → death spiral

5) The entire action figure market contracted

You’re also right that this wasn’t isolated.

Late 80s into ~1990:

Multiple lines declined simultaneously
Kids’ interests shifted (video games, new toy concepts)
The “cartoon + toy line” model temporarily lost steam

Even G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero only survived longer by:

Constant reinvention (new teams, sublines, gimmicks)
Stronger narrative continuity
Broader play patterns (vehicles, military themes)
So why does “overproduction killed it” keep getting repeated?

Because it’s easy shorthand for a more complex chain:

Demand drop → excess inventory → retailer rejection → line cancellation

People often skip straight to the middle of that chain.

Bottom line

Your instinct is correct:

Overproduction alone doesn’t make consumers suddenly stop buying
It only accelerates the collapse after interest declines

MOTU didn’t die because Mattel made too many toys.
Mattel made too many toys because they didn’t realize demand had already peaked—and by the time that became obvious, retail had already moved on.

@sci-fitsunami You are so fucking stupid for using ChatGPT bro and I have actual facts, but I can tell you don't wanna hear them: https://battleramblog.com/what-killed-masters-of-the-universe/

New image per ScreenRant!

Posted by: @sci-fitsunami

↑

I don't know if I'm more pissed off at Hollywood for ruining everything, or all you fans for being so damn passive, accepting & complacent.

That's a pretty bold, blanket statement.

People are allowed to be excited for a movie that's been 40 years in the making... and, by early accounts, a movie that will do MOTU justice and bring in a new generation of fans. Something that is very hard to do.

I understand that everyone has a very specific vision for how they would like to see a MOTU movie made, but that is unrealistic. No two people have the same ideas on the best way to make live action MOTU.

Now, unless you know something the rest of the fanbase does not, why not just give it a chance before dismissing the movie? 

This should be an exciting time for any Masters of the Universe fan. There have been so many reasons to celebrate. Sure, there have been some questionable decisions being made by Mattel - but the fact remains: there is more MOTU in the public consciousness now than there has been in over 30 years... probably only matched by MOTU's peak in the mid-80s.

Posted by: @sci-fitsunami

↑

Here is what ChatGPT has to say about it:

I would be very careful about using ChatGPT to support ANY argument...

It is notoriously accommodating and very often full of misinformation.

It is so willing to please the user that you could get it to agree that the sun revolves around a flat earth.

I knew we were all concerned about Orko in this movie, but seemingly we shouldn't worry anymore

Mer Man on the other hand......is he just....absent?

@slycooperastroboy51 Like I said, they have to save some of these guys for the sequel! 😉

I would hazard a guess that a sequel would give us Mer-Man, Whiplash, Stinkor, and Clawful...

Maybe even Two-Bad.. if we're really lucky!

Posted by: @ornclown

↑

@slycooperastroboy51 Like I said, they have to save some of these guys for the sequel! 😉

I would hazard a guess that a sequel would give us Mer-Man, Whiplash, Stinkor, and Clawful...

Maybe even Two-Bad.. if we're really lucky!

I feel like the magic of this potential movie franchise is getting to see Avengers-like fights with all these heroes and villains fight but you don't need 5-7 solo movies worth of buildup beforehand to understand who they all are.

It's obvious Adam is the hero, Skel is the baddie, but in still calling this movie simply "Masters of the Universe", it seems at least every recurring hero and villain from the franchise who's in this movie will get one or two brief moments to shine, whether be personality or in a fight.

I haven't looked too much into plot synopsis but from what I can gather Randor may be dead in the present day? I think?

So at the end of the movie, My Speculation: I'm guessing Adam will take back Grayskull and Eternos, be crowned king while also being their main protector and leader of the Masters to Skeletor or any greater threat out there.

I think this way a sequel could go in an interesting direction story wise with Adam still readjusting to his life on Eternia but having to juggle so much huge responsibilities

Then he's relieved when his long lost sis shows up (or he finds her?) so he thinks about throwing some of that responsibility baggage onto her right after reuniting. 😆 

I'm really just spitballin' here

but when She-Ra does come in, I DO NOT expect them to adapt Despara because that would likely alienate pure fans of both Filmation and 2018 who don't read the comics nor paid attention to Revolution.

I wouldn't expect She-Ra anytime soon.

The rights to Princess of Power and the 2018 reboot belong to NBC Universal.

Even though Mattel still owns the rights to the intellectual property (to make toys), if a movie was made, or if She-Ra becomes a part of the MOTU cinematic universe, a deal would most likely have to be made where she is shared between the production companies... similar to how Spider-Man is shared between Sony and Marvel Studios.